From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. Fuchs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1905
109 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)

Summary

In Fuchs v. Peterson, supra, (an action of forcible entry and detainer, which is, like ejectment, a possessory action,) it was held that the requirement of a written notice of an election by the lessee to exercise an option for a new lease contained in his existing lease was waived where the lessee gave verbal notice to the lessor, who told him that no further notice would be necessary.

Summary of this case from Neil v. Kennedy

Opinion

November, 1905.


Judgment and orders of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hirschberg, P.J., Woodward, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Peterson v. Fuchs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1905
109 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)

In Fuchs v. Peterson, supra, (an action of forcible entry and detainer, which is, like ejectment, a possessory action,) it was held that the requirement of a written notice of an election by the lessee to exercise an option for a new lease contained in his existing lease was waived where the lessee gave verbal notice to the lessor, who told him that no further notice would be necessary.

Summary of this case from Neil v. Kennedy
Case details for

Peterson v. Fuchs

Case Details

Full title:Otto F. Peterson, Respondent, v. F. Waldemar Fuchs and Others, Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1905

Citations

109 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)

Citing Cases

Welsh v. Jakstas

(Forest Preserve Real Estate Improvement Corp. v. Miller, 379 Ill. 375.) The waiver of a covenant by the…

Wolf v. Tastee Freez Corp.

In 32 Am. Jur., Landlord and Tenant, 980, p. 823, we find the following: "It is well settled that the lessor…