Opinion
Argued March 18, 1925 —
Decided May 18, 1925.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 110.
For the respondent, William G. Demeza and John Winans.
For the appellant, Kellogg Chance.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.