From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Person-Aaron v. O'Connor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 8, 1990
167 A.D.2d 167 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 8, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jack Turret, J.).


The motion for a change of venue was properly granted on the ground that the originally designated venue in Bronx County is improper inasmuch as neither party resides there. (CPLR 510.) While plaintiff seeks to retain venue in Bronx County on the basis of her own convenience and the convenience of a member of her immediate family as a liability witness, neither the convenience of parties nor that of members of their families may be considered. (Ithaca Peripherals v. Sequoia Pac. Sys. Corps., 141 A.D.2d 909, 910.) Similarly, venue in Bronx County cannot be based upon the convenience of treating physicians, since plaintiff did not show that those physicians reside in Bronx County, and since she did not set forth their expected testimony (Moye v. H.L. Green, Inc., 149 A.D.2d 242).

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Sullivan, Carro, Milonas and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Person-Aaron v. O'Connor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 8, 1990
167 A.D.2d 167 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Person-Aaron v. O'Connor

Case Details

Full title:VERA PERSON-AARON, Appellant, v. DENNIS P. O'CONNOR et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 8, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 167 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
561 N.Y.S.2d 247

Citing Cases

People v. Spector

Other examples where the Court did not find exceptional circumstances within the meaning of CPL 30.30 (4)(g)…

Mei Ying Wu v. Waldbaum, Inc.

However, the convenience of the parties and their experts "is not relevant to a determination of a change of…