From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 9, 2007
955 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 4D06-1785.

May 9, 2007.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Larry Schack, Judge; L.T. Case No. 02-1203CFA.

Loren D. Rhoton of Rhoton Hayman, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.


Appellant's postconviction relief claim that prior to entering his plea, his counsel misadvised him as to the length of a potential sentence, is conclusively refuted by the thorough and detailed plea conference conducted by the trial court. See Scheele v. State, 953 So.2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), reh'g granted No. 4D06-38 (Fla. 4th DCA May 9, 2007) (observing that "[w]hat is said and done at a plea conference carries consequences").

Affirmed.

STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Perry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 9, 2007
955 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Perry v. State

Case Details

Full title:John Patrick PERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 9, 2007

Citations

955 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)