Opinion
March 1, 1976.
PRESENT: Paolino, Acting C.J., Joslin, Kelleher and Doris, JJ.
1. CERTIORARI. Status of Petition When Relief Granted Below. Where during pendency of certiorari in Supreme Court, the petitioner's application for a motor vehicle operator's license had been granted by respondent, the case became moot.
2. APPELLATE REVIEW. Basis for Appellate Relief. Relief Granted Below While Certiorari Pending. Supreme Court will not ordinarily spend time in adjudicating when there is no subject matter on which its judgment can operate or in deciding a moot case; nor will court review on certiorari or other prerogative writ if its mandate will be of no assistance to party seeking relief already received.
CERTIORARI petition to review judgment entered in Superior Court relative to petitioner's application for a motor vehicle operator's license, heard and because cause had become moot the petition was denied and dismissed, and records remanded to Superior Court with decision endorsed thereon.
Aram K. Berberian, for petitioner.
Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, Forrest L. Avila, Special Asst. Attorney General, for respondent.
This is a petition for certiorari to review a judgment entered in the Superior Court sustaining the petitioner's appeal, on constitutional grounds, from a decision of the respondent Registrar of Motor Vehicles denying the petitioner's application for a motor vehicle operator's license and remanding the case to the registrar for a further hearing. On September 19, 1974, we granted the petition and ordered the writ to issue forthwith.
The case was heard before us on February 6, 1976. The petitioner's principal argument was that the Superior Court should have ordered the registrar to grant the operator's license to petitioner, instead of remanding the case to the registrar for a further hearing. During the hearing counsel informed us that in September 1975, while the cause was pending in this court, the registrar granted petitioner's application for an operator's license. The respondent suggested that in the circumstances the matter was moot. We agree.
This court will not ordinarily spend its time either proceeding to adjudicate when there is no subject matter on which its judgment can operate or in deciding a moot case. Kimball v. Pelosi, 96 R.I. 429, 192 A.2d 267 (1963). Nor will we review a case on certiorari or other prerogative writ if our mandate will be of no assistance to the party seeking our assistance because what he asks for has already been done. Lauder v. Zoning Board of Review, 100 R.I. 641, 218 A.2d 476 (1966). Since the registrar has already issued an operator's license to the petitioner without a court order, the petitioner has received what he asked for and no further action is necessary.
The petition for certiorari is denied and dismissed, the writ heretofore issued is quashed, and the records certified are remanded to the Superior Court with our decision endorsed theron.