From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perry v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jun 28, 2013
725 F.3d 968 (9th Cir. 2013)

Summary

dissolving the stay of the district court's order enjoining enforcement of Proposition 8

Summary of this case from Ferry v. De Longhi Am. Inc.

Opinion

Nos. 10–16696 11–16577.

2013-06-28

Kristin M. PERRY; Sandra B. Stier; Paul T. Katami; Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs–Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor–Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; Patrick O'Connell, in his official capacity as Clerk–Recorder for the County of Alameda; Dean C. Logan, in his official capacity as Registrar–Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants, Hak–Shing William Tam, Intervenor–Defendant, and Dennis Hollingsworth; Gail Knight; Martin F. Gutierrez; Mark A. Jansson; Protectmarriage.Com–Yes on 8, A Project of California Renewal, as official proponents of Proposition 8, Intervenor–Defendants–Appellants. Kristin M. Perry; Sandra B. Stier; Paul T. Katami; Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs–Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor–Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; Patrick O'Connell, in his official capacity as Clerk–Recorder for the County of Alameda; Dean C. Logan, in his official capacity as Registrar–Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants, Hak–Shing William Tam, Intervenor–Defendant, and Dennis Hollingsworth; Gail J. Knight; Martin F. Gutierrez; Mark A. Jansson; Protectmarriage.Com–Yes on 8, A Project of California Renewal, as official proponents of Proposition 8, Intervenor–Defendants–Appellants.

David Boies, Rosanne C. Baxter, Esquire, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, Armonk, NY, Theodore Olson, Matthew McGill, Amir C. Tayrani, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Esquire, Christopher D. Dusseault, Theane Evangelis Kapur, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Ethan Douglas Dettmer, Esquire, Enrique Antonio Monagas, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, San Francisco, CA, Jeremy Michael Goldman, Esquire, Boies, Schiller & Flenxer, LLP, Oakland, CA, Theodore H. Uno, Bois Schiller & Flexner LLP, Hollywood, FL, for Plaintiffs–Appellees. Ronald P. Flynn, Therese Stewart, Chief Deputy City, Christine Van Aken, Deputy City, Erin Bernstein, Deputy City, San Francisco City Attorney's Office, Vince Chhabria, Esquire, Dennis J. Herrera, City, Mollie Mindes Lee, Deputy City, Office of the City Attorney, San Francisco, CA, Danny Chou, San Jose, CA, for Intervenor–Plaintiff–Appellee.


David Boies, Rosanne C. Baxter, Esquire, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, Armonk, NY, Theodore Olson, Matthew McGill, Amir C. Tayrani, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Esquire, Christopher D. Dusseault, Theane Evangelis Kapur, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Ethan Douglas Dettmer, Esquire, Enrique Antonio Monagas, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, San Francisco, CA, Jeremy Michael Goldman, Esquire, Boies, Schiller & Flenxer, LLP, Oakland, CA, Theodore H. Uno, Bois Schiller & Flexner LLP, Hollywood, FL, for Plaintiffs–Appellees. Ronald P. Flynn, Therese Stewart, Chief Deputy City, Christine Van Aken, Deputy City, Erin Bernstein, Deputy City, San Francisco City Attorney's Office, Vince Chhabria, Esquire, Dennis J. Herrera, City, Mollie Mindes Lee, Deputy City, Office of the City Attorney, San Francisco, CA, Danny Chou, San Jose, CA, for Intervenor–Plaintiff–Appellee.
Before: REINHARDT, HAWKINS, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

The stay in the above matter is dissolved effective immediately.


Summaries of

Perry v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jun 28, 2013
725 F.3d 968 (9th Cir. 2013)

dissolving the stay of the district court's order enjoining enforcement of Proposition 8

Summary of this case from Ferry v. De Longhi Am. Inc.

dissolving stay of order that had enjoined California's marriage ban

Summary of this case from Rolando v. Fox
Case details for

Perry v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:Kristin M. PERRY; Sandra B. Stier; Paul T. Katami; Jeffrey J. Zarrillo…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Jun 28, 2013

Citations

725 F.3d 968 (9th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Schuett v. FedEx Corp.

Also on June 26, 2013, the Court issued a decision in Hollingsworth v. Perry, ––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 2652,…

Rolando v. Fox

See Connolly v. Jeanes, 2014 WL 5320642 (D.Ariz.2014), and Hamby v. Parnell, ––– F.Supp.3d ––––, 2014 WL…