From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perrault v. Proffer

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans
Dec 1, 1947
33 So. 2d 579 (La. Ct. App. 1947)

Opinion

No. 18868.

December 1, 1947.

Appeal from Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson; L. Robert Rivarde, Judge.

Suit by L.J. Perrault against E.O. Proffer to recover for the violation of a contract involving the purchase and sale of real estate. Judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed, and the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Appeal transferred to the Supreme Court.

Maurice B. Gatlin and Harry R. Hill, both of New Orleans, for plaintiff and appellant.

Melvin P. Barre and Rene R. Nicaud, both of New Orleans, for defendant and appellee.


Defendant-appellee moves to dismiss this appeal for the reason of our lack of jurisdiction. The suit involves a demand for the sum of $2,000 with legal interest, plus attorneys' fees in the amount of $500. The amount sued for is claimed by plaintiff as the amount due him arising out of the alleged violation by defendant of a contract involving the purchase and sale of certain real estate located near LaPlace, Louisiana. The petition alleges that under the terms of the contract plaintiff is entitled to recover his attorneys' fees.

Appellee contends that the amount of attorneys' fees should be added to the $2,000 claimed and that the aggregate of these amounts is in excess of our maximum jurisdictional limit under Const.1921, art. 7, §§ 10, 29.

This contention is meritorious. It is well established that an attorney's fee fixed in a contract forms part of the demand and that it is inseparable from the main demand in determining the matter of appellate jurisdiction. See Thompson v. Jones, 200 La. 437, 438, 8 So.2d 286, and cases therein cited.

Exercising the discretion with which we are vested by Act No. 19 of 1912, we conclude that the matter should be transferred to the Supreme Court.

In his motion, appellee also contends that the appeal should be dismissed for the reason that the appeal bond furnished by the appellant is defective. As we have no jurisdiction of this matter we cannot pass upon this second ground of complaint.

Therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that this appeal be and it is transferred to the Supreme Court of Louisiana to be adjudicated according to law; the transfer is to be made within sixty days after this judgment becomes final, and if the transfer is not so made, then the appeal is to be considered dismissed; plaintiff-appellant is to pay the costs of appeal in this court, and all other costs are to await the final determination of the matter.

Appeal transferred to Supreme Court.


Summaries of

Perrault v. Proffer

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans
Dec 1, 1947
33 So. 2d 579 (La. Ct. App. 1947)
Case details for

Perrault v. Proffer

Case Details

Full title:PERRAULT v. PROFFER

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans

Date published: Dec 1, 1947

Citations

33 So. 2d 579 (La. Ct. App. 1947)

Citing Cases

Finance Security Co. v. Sinclair

35) Dollars, with interest and twenty-five per cent additional as attorney's fees. Under Article VII,…

Brantley v. Tugwell

It is established that, where a party agrees by contract to pay a stipulated or a reasonable attorney's fee…