From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perkins Diggs v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Arkansas (In Banc)
Nov 13, 1979
589 S.W.2d 29 (Ark. 1979)

Opinion

No. 79-304

Opinion delivered November 13, 1979

APPEAL ERROR — APPEAL OF DECISION OF COURT OF APPEALS — NO APPEAL AS A MATTER OF RIGHT. The Supreme Court will not review as a matter of right a decision of the Court of Appeals based on a tie-vote.

Petition for Certiorari to Review a Decision of the Court of Appeals; denied.

B. W. Sanders and Toney D. McMillan, for petitioners.

Henry Morgan, for respondent.


The petitioners seek review of a Court of Appeals decision in a child custody case citing three reasons: a tie-vote of the Court of Appeals, a significant legal issue and an erroneous application of the standard of review for such a case.

After carefully reviewing the petition, the response and the opinion of the Court of Appeals judges, we find that essentially there is simply a question of fact involved and that is, which party should have custody of the child in question. We find nothing else that would warrant granting the review and, consequently, we deny the petition.

Rule 29.6 of the Supreme Court Rules specifically states that no appeal, as a matter of right, lies from the Court of Appeals to this court. While a tie-vote may be reason for us to review a decision of the Court of Appeals, we do not automatically grant such a review. This is one of those cases that we find does not merit review.

HARRIS, C.J., not participating.


Summaries of

Perkins Diggs v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Arkansas (In Banc)
Nov 13, 1979
589 S.W.2d 29 (Ark. 1979)
Case details for

Perkins Diggs v. Perkins

Case Details

Full title:Donna PERKINS Charlene DIGGS v. Calvin Ronald PERKINS

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas (In Banc)

Date published: Nov 13, 1979

Citations

589 S.W.2d 29 (Ark. 1979)
589 S.W.2d 29

Citing Cases

Standridge v. State

We granted appellant's petition for a writ of certiorari because of the tie vote and because the case merited…