From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perini v. Schmyg

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Oct 1, 1898
24 Misc. 761 (N.Y. App. Term 1898)

Opinion

October, 1898.

A.J. Wise, for appellant.

Wahle Stone, for respondent.


The owner having discharged the lien by deposit with the county clerk, no order for its continuance was necessary in order to support a foreclosure action instituted after the expiration of a year from the date of filing the lien. Hafker v. Henry, 5 A.D. 258. The judgment also was not so erroneous in form as to call for a reversal. Egan v. Laemmle, 5 Misc. 244.

Present: BEEKMAN, P.J., GILDERSLEEVE and GIEGERICH, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Perini v. Schmyg

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Oct 1, 1898
24 Misc. 761 (N.Y. App. Term 1898)
Case details for

Perini v. Schmyg

Case Details

Full title:MASSIMUS PERINI, Respondent, v . FRANCIS J. SCHMYG, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Oct 1, 1898

Citations

24 Misc. 761 (N.Y. App. Term 1898)