From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. E. Side Top Cleaners

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 4, 2021
20-cv-5509 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-5509 (LJL)

02-04-2021

JUANA RAMALES PEREZ, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. EAST SIDE TOP CLEANERS., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

:

The Court is in receipt of a letter from the parties in this action, brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., advising that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. See Dkt. No. 12. Under current Second Circuit law, any settlement—including any proposed attorney's fee award—must be scrutinized by the Court to ensure that it is fair. See Fisher v. SD Protection Inc., 948 F.3d 593, 600 (2d. Cir. 2020); Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015).

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, on or before March 4, 2021, the parties must submit the settlement agreement to the Court along with a joint letter explaining the basis for the proposed settlement and why it should be approved as fair and reasonable, with reference to the factors discussed in Wolinsky v. Scholastic, Inc., 900 F. Supp. 2d 332, 335-36 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). The letter should address any confidentiality provisions, non-disparagement provisions, or releases in the proposed settlement agreement. The letter should also address, if applicable, any incentive payments to the plaintiff and any attorney's fee award to plaintiff's counsel (with documentation to support the latter, if appropriate) consistent with the principles set forth in Fisher, 948 F.3d at 600. It is not sufficient to state the proportion of the requested attorney's fee to the overall settlement amount. Rather, the reasonableness of attorney's fees must be evaluated with reference to "adequate documentation supporting the attorneys' fees and costs," which "should normally [include] contemporaneous time records indicating, for each attorney, the date, the hours expended, and the nature of the work done." Id.; see Strauss v. Little Fish Corp., 2020 WL 4041511, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. July 17, 2020) (LJL) (discussing the requirements for adequately justifying an attorney's fee). Failure to provide the appropriate or sufficient documentation could result in the Court rejecting the proposed fee award.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the status conference scheduled for tomorrow, February 4, 2021, is CANCELLED, and that a fairness hearing will be held on March 11, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. At that date and time the parties are ORDERED to dial the Court's teleconference line at 888-251-2909 (access code: 2123101) and to follow the necessary prompts.

SO ORDERED. Dated: February 4, 2021

New York, New York

/s/_________

LEWIS J. LIMAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Perez v. E. Side Top Cleaners

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 4, 2021
20-cv-5509 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Perez v. E. Side Top Cleaners

Case Details

Full title:JUANA RAMALES PEREZ, individually and on behalf of others similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 4, 2021

Citations

20-cv-5509 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2021)