From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 9, 1978
358 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

Nos. 77-95 to 77-98, 77-420 and 77-421.

May 9, 1978. Rehearing Denied June 9, 1978.

Appeals from Circuit Court, Dade County; Arden M. Siegendorf, Judge.

Horton, Perse Ginsberg, Dan G. Wheeler, Miami, for appellants.

Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick Hoehl, James E. Tribble, Arky, Freed, Stearns, Watson Greer, Alison W. Miller, Goodwin, Ryskamp, Welcher Carrier, Knight, Peters, Pickle, Noemoeller Flynn, Jeanne Heyward, Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole Selwood, Steven R. Berger and Bette Ellen Quiat, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.) and PARKER, J. GWYNN (Ret.), Associate Judges.


Plaintiffs have appealed from summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants. On consideration thereof in light of the record, briefs and argument, we have concluded there are presented genuine issues of material fact relating to the status and duties of defendants as bearing on the question of liability which properly may not be resolved by summary judgment.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Perez v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 9, 1978
358 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Perez v. City of Miami

Case Details

Full title:MARIO PEREZ, II, AND HILDA PEREZ, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF MIAMI…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 9, 1978

Citations

358 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Yambo v. Gen. American Life Ins. Co.

As contended by both parties, though at different stages of the proceedings, there are genuine issues of law…

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Zisook

PER CURIAM. The defendant below, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, appeals from a summary…