From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez-Priego v. Bayside Carburetor

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 25, 1994
633 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Summary

In Perez-Priego, the petitioner sought second-tier certiorari review from the district court after the circuit court appellate division affirmed a county court verdict in favor of a repair shop alleged to have performed repairs without submitting a written estimate to the customer.

Summary of this case from Safari Tours, Inc. v. Pasco

Opinion

No. 93-1959.

March 25, 1994.

Appeal from the County Court, Marion County.

Angela Perez-Priego, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


Petitioner seeks review in this court of a decision of the circuit court acting in its appellate capacity affirming an order of the county court denying petitioner's claim for relief. We elect to treat this proceeding as a petition for certiorari. We deny the writ for failure to show any departure from the essential requirements of law. See Carrillo v. State, 466 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 476 So.2d 673 (Fla. 1985).

In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 609 So.2d 516, 529 (Fla. 1992); Committee Note to Rule 9.040.

Petitioner's claim was brought under section 559.903, Florida Statutes ("The Florida Motor Vehicle Repair Act"). She sought to recover the cost of repairs paid to Bayside Carburetor on the ground that the repair shop failed to submit to her a written estimate in advance of doing the repairs. Respondent apparently disputed that fact. The county court appears to have rejected petitioner's claim that she could retain the benefit of the repairs and still sue to recover their cost since she had, in fact, authorized the work.

Petitioner is correct that, under Florida law, a consumer who is not given a written estimate may recover the amount of the repair bill and still retain the benefit of the repairs. Osteen v. Morris, 481 So.2d 1287 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). However, in this case, there is no record of the trial below. This fact makes it impossible for us to determine that the lower court ruled in error since there may have been evidence proffered by respondent that it complied with the statute.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED.

W. SHARP, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Perez-Priego v. Bayside Carburetor

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 25, 1994
633 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

In Perez-Priego, the petitioner sought second-tier certiorari review from the district court after the circuit court appellate division affirmed a county court verdict in favor of a repair shop alleged to have performed repairs without submitting a written estimate to the customer.

Summary of this case from Safari Tours, Inc. v. Pasco
Case details for

Perez-Priego v. Bayside Carburetor

Case Details

Full title:ANGELA PEREZ-PRIEGO, APPELLANT, v. BAYSIDE CARBURETOR AND IGNITION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 25, 1994

Citations

633 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Scibek v. Longette

See Donaldson v. Doe, 194 Cal.App.3d 817, 239Cal.Rptr. 801 (Ct.App. 1997) (failure to provide written…

Safari Tours, Inc. v. Pasco

Phoenix has not cited to us any authority that purely oral communications – possibly reflected in a trial…