From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peoples v. Tuck

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 17, 2017
802 S.E.2d 730 (N.C. 2017)

Opinion

No. 423P16

08-17-2017

Cecelia W. PEOPLES and Ernest A. Robinson, Jr. v. Thomas H. TUCK

Donald J. Dunn, Attorney at Law, Goldsboro, Molly M. Schertzinger, Attorney at Law, Jacksonville, Jonathan M. Smith, Attorney at Law, Goldsboro, for Peoples, Cecelia W., et al. David O. Lewis, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Tuck, Thomas H.


Donald J. Dunn, Attorney at Law, Goldsboro, Molly M. Schertzinger, Attorney at Law, Jacksonville, Jonathan M. Smith, Attorney at Law, Goldsboro, for Peoples, Cecelia W., et al.

David O. Lewis, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Tuck, Thomas H.

ORDER

Defendant's petition for discretionary review is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals to reconsider its holding in light of United Community Bank (G.A.) v. Wolfe , ––– N.C. ––––, 799 S.E.2d 269 (2017). See United Cmty. Bank , ––– N.C. at ––––, 799 S.E.2d at 272 (recognizing that, under N.C.G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(e), a party may not rest upon an affidavit containing merely "conclusory statement[s] without any supporting facts" to create a genuine issue of material fact).:

"Spec Order by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."


Summaries of

Peoples v. Tuck

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 17, 2017
802 S.E.2d 730 (N.C. 2017)
Case details for

Peoples v. Tuck

Case Details

Full title:Cecelia W. PEOPLES and Ernest A. Robinson, Jr. v. Thomas H. TUCK

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Aug 17, 2017

Citations

802 S.E.2d 730 (N.C. 2017)