From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Zapata

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 6, 2016
143 A.D.3d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

10-06-2016

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Aramis ZAPATA, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Antoine Morris of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Andrew E. Seewald of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Antoine Morris of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Andrew E. Seewald of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Maxwell Wiley, J.), rendered January 29, 2014, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of two years, with three years' postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's challenge to his plea does not come within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement (see People v. Conceicao, 26 N.Y.3d 375, 23 N.Y.S.3d 124, 44 N.E.3d 199 [2015] ; People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 [1988] ), and we decline to review this unpreserved claim in the interest of justice. As an alternate holding, we find no basis for reversal. During the plea allocution itself, defendant admitted his guilt and said nothing that negated any element of the crime or raised any defenses (see People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 631 N.Y.S.2d 119, 655 N.E.2d 160 [1995] ). Accordingly, the court had no obligation to conduct a sua sponte inquiry into defendant's postplea assertions of innocence, as reflected in the presentence report (see e.g. People v. Pantoja, 281 A.D.2d 245, 721 N.Y.S.2d 535 [1st Dept.2001], lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 905, 730 N.Y.S.2d 803, 756 N.E.2d 91 [2001] ).

Regardless of whether defendant validly waived his right to appeal, we find that the court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. The record supports the court's finding of abandonment. We also perceive no basis for reducing the term of postrelease supervision.

RENWICK, J.P., RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, FEINMAN, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Zapata

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 6, 2016
143 A.D.3d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Zapata

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Aramis ZAPATA…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 6, 2016

Citations

143 A.D.3d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
143 A.D.3d 477
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6549

Citing Cases

People v. Zapata

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 1st Dept: 143 AD3d 477 (NY)…

People v. Cook

Nothing defendant said or failed to say in his plea allocution negated any element of the offense to which he…