From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Zamora

Colorado Court of Appeals
Mar 10, 1983
665 P.2d 153 (Colo. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82CA0560

Decided March 10, 1983. Rehearing Denied April 21, 1983.

Appeal from the District Court of Adams County Honorable Phillip F. Roan, Judge

J.D. MacFarlane, Attorney General, Charles B. Howe, Deputy Attorney General, Joel W. Cantrick, Special Assistant Attorney General, John Milton Hutchins, Assistant Attorney General, for plaintiff-appellee.

John E. Popovich, Jr., for witness-appellant.

Division III.


A one-year sentence for contempt was imposed on Anthony Ullibari for his refusal to testify in the prosecution of William Robert Zamora. Ullibari contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the judgment. He further argues that the one-year sentence was impermissible because no opportunity for a jury trial was given. We affirm the finding of contempt, vacate the sentence and remand the case to the trial court for resentencing not in excess of six months.

Ullibari's argument that the trial court's findings were insufficient under C.R.C.P. 107(b) to support the judgment for contempt is without merit. The trial court's specific findings that Ullibari's refusal to testify constituted offensive conduct amounting to an obstruction of justice, and that this behavior was not excused by his fear of retribution from other penitentiary inmates, satisfied the requirements of C.R.C.P. 107(b). See Board of Water Works v. Pueblo Water Works Employees Local 1045, 196 Colo. 308, 586 P.2d 18 (1978); Lobb v. Hodges, 641 P.2d 310 (Colo.App. 1982). However, confinement for contempt for longer than six months is constitutionally impermissible unless the person has been given the opportunity for a jury trial. Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194, 88 S.Ct. 1477, 20 L.Ed.2d 522 (1968); see also Padilla v. Padilla, 645 P.2d 1327 (Colo.App. 1982).

As the record is devoid of evidence that Ullibari waived a jury trial in this contempt action, see Rice v. People, 193 Colo. 270, 565 P.2d 940 (1977), we conclude that the trial court was without authority to impose the one-year sentence.

Accordingly, the judgment finding Ullibari in contempt is affirmed. The sentence is vacated and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to resentence not in excess of six months.

JUDGE VAN CISE and JUDGE KIRSHBAUM concur.


Summaries of

People v. Zamora

Colorado Court of Appeals
Mar 10, 1983
665 P.2d 153 (Colo. App. 1983)
Case details for

People v. Zamora

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Robert…

Court:Colorado Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 10, 1983

Citations

665 P.2d 153 (Colo. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

People v. Tyer

She argues that because she was denied a trial before a jury, the court had no jurisdiction to reimpose the…

People v. Razatos

The deprivation of a person's liberty has the same effect on the confined person when jailed after civil or…