Opinion
2646
December 24, 2002.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J. on consolidation motion; Daniel FitzGerald J. at jury trial and sentence), rendered November 15, 2000, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 7 to 14 years, unanimously affirmed.
Alan Gadlin, for respondent.
Michael J.Z. Mannheimer, for defendant-appellant.
Before: NARDELLI, J.P., SAXE, SULLIVAN, ROSENBERGER, ELLERIN, JJ.
The court properly exercised its discretion in granting the People's motion for consolidation of legally similar charges pursuant to CPL 200.20(2)(c). In opposing the People's motion, defendant's efforts to show that he had important testimony to give concerning the second indictment and a strong need to refrain from testifying as to the first indictment were conclusory and unconvincing (see People v. Lane, 56 N.Y.2d 1; People v. Anderson, 118 A.D.2d 788, 789-790, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 1050, cert denied 479 U.S. 859). In any event, defendant was not prejudiced by the consolidation since his proposed defense against the second indictment would have opened the door to evidence of the crimes charged in the first indictment (see People v. McCune, 210 A.D.2d 978, lv denied 85 N.Y.2d 864; see also People v. Hudson, 273 A.D.2d 83, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 890).
We also note that, during the consolidated trial, defendant did not testify, and that defense counsel specifically explained that this was primarily because of the court's Sandoval ruling (which is not challenged on appeal). Moreover, there was overwhelming evidence supporting the sole charge of which defendant was convicted, and he was acquitted of the other charges.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.