From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Witkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 2011
82 A.D.3d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010-03198.

March 8, 2011.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grosso, J.), dated March 12, 2010, which, after a hearing, denied his motion for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46, on his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon his plea of guilty, on October 14, 2004.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Joshua M. Levine of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Rona I. Kruger of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Eng, Belen and Sgroi, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The defendant was convicted, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree ( see Penal Law § 220.16), based on an offense committed in 2003, and was sentenced in October 2004 to an indeterminate term of 6 to 12 years of imprisonment. In January 2010 the defendant moved to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46, which extends to certain eligible individuals in the custody of the Department of Correctional Services who were convicted of a class B felony offense defined in Penal Law article 220 committed prior to January 13, 2005, the opportunity to seek a resentence in accordance with the resentencing provisions of the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 ( see CPL 440.46, [3]; L 2004, ch 738, § 23). The Supreme Court denied the defendant's motion.

The defendant had an extensive criminal history dating back to 1996, and the instant offense was committed two months after he was released on parole. Moreover, during the defendant's incarceration, he has committed numerous tier III and tier II infractions, including, among other things, carrying a concealed razor, fighting with fellow inmates, setting another inmate's bed on fire, and possession of gang-related materials. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion ( see CPL 440.46; L 2004, ch 738, § 23; People v Winfield, 59 AD3d 747, 748 ; People v Perez, 57 AD3d 921, 922; People v Flores, 50 AD3d 1156; People v Vega, 40 AD3d 1020, 1020-1021; People v Sanders, 36 AD3d 944).


Summaries of

People v. Witkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 2011
82 A.D.3d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Witkowski

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GLEN WITKOWSKI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 8, 2011

Citations

82 A.D.3d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 1873
918 N.Y.S.2d 367

Citing Cases

People v. Witkowski

May 27, 2011. Appeal from the 2d Dept: 82 AD3d 913 (Queens). Graffeo,…

People v. Wilson

As of the date that the defendant submitted the instant motion for resentencing, he had been issued 39 prison…