Opinion
April 15, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Goldberg, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
It is clear from the record that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently absented himself during that portion of his Wade hearing when the identifying eyewitness testified ( see, People v. Closure, 202 A.D.2d 985).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, O'Brien and McGinity, JJ., concur.