From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 22, 1994
201 A.D.2d 399 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 22, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.).


The hearing court properly found that while the police could lawfully approach defendant for mere inquiry regarding his early morning "huddle" with two other individuals in front of a known drug location (People v. Hollman, 79 N.Y.2d 181, 185), the officer's direction that defendant halt and take his hands out of his pockets escalated the level of intrusion to that of the common law right of inquiry, requiring "a founded suspicion that criminal activity is afoot" (People v. De Bour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 223), a circumstance, as conceded by the arresting officer, not present in this case. The hearing court also properly found that defendant's actions in dropping a bag containing contraband as he took his hands out of his pockets as directed, was not a calculated, voluntary abandonment, but a spontaneous reaction to improper police action (People v. Boodle, 47 N.Y.2d 398, 404, cert denied 444 U.S. 969).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Asch and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 22, 1994
201 A.D.2d 399 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. CONNIE WILSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 399 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
607 N.Y.S.2d 663

Citing Cases

People v. Giles

When those questions escalated into a more pointed interaction in which Lieutenant O'Neill ordered the…

People v. Reeves

The appellate court reversed the convictions, finding that the level of intrusion by the police was not…