From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wilson

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jun 24, 1968
11 Mich. App. 721 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

Docket No. 3,687.

Decided June 24, 1968. Application for leave to appeal filed December 27, 1968.

Appeal from Recorder's Court of Detroit, Brennan (Vincent J.), J. Submitted Division 1 June 6, 1968, at Detroit. (Docket No. 3,687.) Decided June 24, 1968. Application for leave to appeal filed December 27, 1968.

Nathaniel Wilson was convicted on a plea of guilty of larceny from the person. Affirmed.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Samuel J. Torina, Chief Appellate Lawyer, and Angelo Pentolino, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Edward P. Echlin, for defendant on appeal.


By his plea of guilty on December 6, 1966, defendant was convicted of larceny from the person. CL 1948, § 750.357 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.589). He was sentenced to prison and appeals. He contends the trial judge erred reversibly by failing to comply with CL 1948, § 767.27 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.967). The record fails to disclose anything requiring a proceeding under the latter statute which requires a sanity hearing when applicable, nor does the record disclose any reason for defendant's attorney to have raised the issue of insanity.

This section was repealed by PA 1966, No 266, effective March 10, 1967, and a new section added to PA 1927, ch 7 (MCLA § 767.27a, Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 28.966[1]). — REPORTER.

Affirmed.

QUINN, P.J., and FITZGERALD and J.H. GILLIS, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

People v. Wilson

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jun 24, 1968
11 Mich. App. 721 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

People v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. WILSON

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 24, 1968

Citations

11 Mich. App. 721 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968)
162 N.W.2d 161

Citing Cases

People v. Sherman Williams

Commitment was ordered only if incompetency was satisfactorily proven. Under these earlier statutes a mere…