From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Willsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1993
198 A.D.2d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 19, 1993

Appeal from the Steuben County Court, Purple, Jr., J.

Present — Green, J.P., Balio, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The suppression court properly rejected defendant's contention that items of physical evidence seized by police were the product of an illegal stop not supported by a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity (see, People v May, 81 N.Y.2d 725, 727). The automobile in which defendant was a passenger was stopped less than half a mile from the scene of the robbery, on a road intersecting the perpetrator's likely escape route. The stop occurred within 15 minutes of the initial report of the robbery. Defendant and the other passenger, codefendant Charles Allen, matched the general description provided by the victim. Under those circumstances, the police officer was justified in stopping the vehicle based upon a reasonable suspicion that defendant and codefendant had committed the robbery (see, People v Johnson, 102 A.D.2d 616, 623-624).


Summaries of

People v. Willsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1993
198 A.D.2d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Willsey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD D. WILLSEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 19, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
604 N.Y.S.2d 461

Citing Cases

State v. Black

We reject the People's contention that defendant had no right to contest the legality of the stop of the…

People v. Van Every

The vehicle was spotted approximately 10 to 15 minutes after the crime, which is consistent with the length…