From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. West

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 4, 1963
190 N.E.2d 532 (N.Y. 1963)

Opinion

Argued January 22, 1963

Decided April 4, 1963

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, MARTIN SCHENCK, J.

John T. Garry, II, District Attorney ( Condon A. Lyons of counsel), for appellant.

Bernard Ellenbogen for respondent.

Martin F. Richman and Melvin L. Wulf for American Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiae.


Order reversed and judgment of the County Court, Albany County, reinstated upon the ground that, when counsel for defendant voiced "no objection" to the admission into evidence of the material allegedly obtained contrary to the principles enunciated in Mapp v. Ohio ( 367 U.S. 643), no question of law was preserved for review by any appellate court ( People v. Friola, 11 N.Y.2d 157; People v. Kelly, 12 N.Y.2d 248). Although the Appellate Division is empowered to consider the legality of the evidence in deciding whether to reverse on the facts or in the "interests of justice" (see People v. Kelly, supra), that court has indicated in the present case that "Except for the asserted question of law [it] would have affirmed on the facts". Other alleged errors raised by defendant on this appeal are without substance. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI.


Summaries of

People v. West

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 4, 1963
190 N.E.2d 532 (N.Y. 1963)
Case details for

People v. West

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. LEON E. WEST, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 4, 1963

Citations

190 N.E.2d 532 (N.Y. 1963)
190 N.E.2d 532
240 N.Y.S.2d 159

Citing Cases

United States v. LaVallee

The Court of Appeals, New York, unanimously reversed the order of the Appellate Division and reinstated the…

United States v. Lavallee

However, the Court of Appeals in turn reversed this decision, holding that petitioner had waived his right to…