From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Watson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1968
29 A.D.2d 987 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

April 22, 1968


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 19, 1967, convicting him, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny. This appeal has brought up for review an intermediate order of said court, made on November 23, 1966 after a hearing, which denied his motion to suppress certain evidence. Judgment and order affirmed. In our opinion, the circumstances herein present a classic case sustaining a detention under the "Stop and Frisk" statute (Code Crim. Pro., § 180-a). We hold that a police officer, who responds to a radio patrol call and corners an alleged prowler after a chase, has reasonable grounds to detain the suspect for routine questioning and may require him to accompany the officer to the scene of the offense (see People v. Taggart, 20 N.Y.2d 335; People v. Peters, 18 N.Y.2d 238; cf. People v. Gallmon, 19 N.Y.2d 389). We have considered defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit. Beldock, P.J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Watson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1968
29 A.D.2d 987 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

People v. Watson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALAN WATSON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1968

Citations

29 A.D.2d 987 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

People v. Trapier

Even assuming that the police could lawfully stop the person described in the call (cf. People v Taggart, 20…

People v. Merola, McCole

We are of the view that, although there is a "troublesome line posed * * * between mere suspicion and…