From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Watson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 26, 1995
220 A.D.2d 333 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 26, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Richard Lee Price, J.).


The trial court properly refused defendant's request for a missing witness charge as to a correction officer who may have been in a position to view the assault. Defendant failed to demonstrate that this uncalled witness viewed anything different from what the testifying officer saw ( People v. Ortiz, 83 N.Y.2d 989). The trial court also properly denied a missing witness charge with respect to another correction officer whom defendant claims would have provided testimony concerning the chain of custody of the razor. This witness's testimony would have been immaterial since the razor was not introduced into evidence, and, in any event, would have constituted hearsay ( People v. Small, 201 A.D.2d 315, 316, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 876).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ross and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Watson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 26, 1995
220 A.D.2d 333 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Watson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DWIGHT WATSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 26, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 333 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 15

Citing Cases

People v. Stewart

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court providently…

People v. Facey

05[2]; People v. Spinelli, 79 A.D.3d 1152, 913 N.Y.S.2d 582;People v. Lopez, 19 A.D.3d 510, 511, 798 N.Y.S.2d…