From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Watkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 15, 1998
256 A.D.2d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 15, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.).


The motion court properly concluded that the search of defendant's bag was proper as incident to a lawful arrest since it was conducted simultaneously with defendant being handcuffed ( see, People v. Wylie, 244 A.D.2d 247, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 946), and defendant's property had not yet been reduced to the exclusive control of the police. Contrary to defendant's arguments, the requisite exigency was readily inferable from the officer's testimony ( People v. Moore, 32 N.Y.2d 67, 72, cert denied 414 U.S. 1011).

Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Watkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 15, 1998
256 A.D.2d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Watkins

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PETER WATKINS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
682 N.Y.S.2d 40

Citing Cases

People v. Luna

Other decisions have apparently relied on the rationale that so long as a search occurs shortly after an…

People v. Harris

Contrary to the suggestion by the dissent, an officer need not affirmatively testify to the exigency…