Opinion
October 26, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pesce, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Having failed to raise any objections to the adequacy of the plea allocution in the court of first instance by moving to set it aside or to vacate the judgment, the defendant failed to preserve his claims for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Maida, 147 A.D.2d 711; People v Lucas, 119 A.D.2d 700). In any event, the court made sufficient inquiry as to the defendant's intent to cause the death of the victim (see, People v Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662).
There is no requirement that a court inquire into a defendant's possible affirmative defenses unless something in the record indicates that an affirmative defense may exist (see, People v Martinez, 127 A.D.2d 855). Consequently, we reject the defendant's claim, asserted for the first time on appeal, that he may have been acting under extreme emotional disturbance owing to two recent deaths in his family and the fact that the victim was a purported drug dealer who had harassed the defendant previously.
We find that the defendant was afforded effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.