Summary
holding that customer lists containing publicly known entities may nonetheless contain non-public information
Summary of this case from IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS v. LEICHTNAMOpinion
July 12, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey Atlas, J.).
We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction", we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305.)
Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms." (People v. Felman, 141 A.D.2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 918.)
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kassal, Ellerin, Smith and Rubin, JJ.