From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Walos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1996
229 A.D.2d 953 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 12, 1996

Appeal from the Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Callahan, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment of County Court convicting him upon a jury verdict of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [recklessly causing serious physical injury]). The conviction arose out of an incident in which defendant slashed the victim's face, thigh, and back with a box cutter.

On appeal, defendant contends that the court's reasonable doubt instruction was deficient, that the evidence is insufficient to establish serious physical injury, and that the sentence is harsh and excessive.

The challenged portions of the court's charge, instructing the jurors to decide whether a crime had been committed and whether defendant committed it, and that the trial was a "search for the truth," did not dilute the standard of proof. The evidence at trial, particularly a photograph of the victim's face, establishes that the victim sustained serious physical injury, viz., "serious and protracted disfigurement" (Penal Law § 10.00). Finally, we conclude that the sentence of 2 1/3 to 7 years is not unduly harsh or severe in light of defendant's history of assaultive behavior.


Summaries of

People v. Walos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1996
229 A.D.2d 953 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Walos

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JASON A. WALOS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 953 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
645 N.Y.S.2d 695

Citing Cases

The People v. Mateo

The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People ( see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621) is…

State v. Aleksey

e mind of a reasonable man who is earnestly seeking truth" did not shift burden to defendant, even though it…