From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Walker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 21, 1991
170 A.D.2d 362 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

February 21, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J.).


Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People, and bearing in mind that credibility is a matter to be determined by the trier of facts, we conclude that defendant's guilt of the crimes of which he was convicted was proven beyond a reasonable doubt (People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), and that the verdict was supported by the weight of the evidence (People v Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). We reject defendant's claim that the eyewitness's testimony was not credible or that there existed discrepancies and inconsistencies with respect to the testimony of the People's remaining witnesses, especially since these latter claims involve, for the most part, collateral matters. Additionally, we find that the element of intent to kill (Penal Law § 125.25), was established beyond a reasonable doubt, given that defendant fired his shotgun through a wooden panel next to the front door of the club at the same height as the victim's vital bodily organs, immediately after pointing the weapon at the complainant who then moved beyond the panel. (People v Perez, 64 N.Y.2d 868.)

Defendant was not deprived of a fair trial merely because the court charged the jury that defendant was an interested witness. It is well settled that it is proper to charge defendant's obvious interest in the outcome of the case. (People v Ochs, 3 N.Y.2d 54.) Moreover, the court's charge was, in any event, balanced and proper insofar as it advised the jury that it should consider the interests of all witnesses. (People v Hickey, 162 A.D.2d 708, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 858.)

Defendant has failed to demonstrate that the sentencing court committed an abuse of discretion. We have considered and rejected, to the extent preserved, defendant's pro se arguments, noting that there was insufficient evidence to establish a justification defense, since defendant had not availed himself of the opportunity to retreat (Penal Law § 35.15 [a]).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Ellerin, Ross and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Walker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 21, 1991
170 A.D.2d 362 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MALCOLM WALKER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1991

Citations

170 A.D.2d 362 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
566 N.Y.S.2d 64

Citing Cases

People v. Holly

In any event, the charge was properly balanced. The court gave a general interested witness charge, and…