From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vullis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 8, 1987
131 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

June 8, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The arresting officer, the only witness to testify at the suppression hearing, observed no suspicious conduct on the defendant's part immediately before she frisked him. Whether the mere observance of a bulge containing no particular outline in the defendant's left front pocket was a circumstance justifying the frisk (cf., People v Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759) need not be determined. Upon retrieving a plastic beeper from the defendant's pocket the arresting officer should have ended her search. The record is devoid of any indication that she reasonably suspected she was in danger of physical injury (CPL 140.50). Therefore, the officer was not justified in also retrieving small plastic bags containing the contraband, upon which the arrest of the defendant was premised (see, People v McNatt, 65 N.Y.2d 1046; People v Kugler, 122 A.D.2d 955; cf., People v Davis, 64 N.Y.2d 1143). Mangano, J.P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Vullis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 8, 1987
131 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Vullis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. NICK VULLIS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 8, 1987

Citations

131 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Rainey

Nor did the officer observe any type of bulge on the defendant or the other stopped individual. Moreover,…

People v. Perry

, People v. Howard, 50 N.Y.2d 583, cert denied 449 U.S. 1023). The only possible justification for the "pat…