Opinion
December 10, 1984
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
We concur with the court's conclusions that the defendant's statements to the police and Assistant District Attorney Runowicz were not the product of an illegal detention, nor were they involuntarily obtained (see People v. Munro, 86 A.D.2d 683; People v. Bryant, 71 A.D.2d 564, affd 50 N.Y.2d 949, cert den 449 U.S. 958; People v. Patterson, 73 A.D.2d 922, affd 53 N.Y.2d 829, mot for rearg or recons den 54 N.Y.2d 753).
Moreover, we find that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction for burglary in the first degree.
We have considered defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P.J., Gibbons, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.