From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 30, 2005
19 A.D.3d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

6457.

June 30, 2005.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James A. Yates, J.), rendered February 5, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of promoting prostitution in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Stanley Neustadter and Bobbi C. Sternheim, Cardozo Appeals Clinic, New York (Daniel V. Grusenmeyer, Jr. of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Dana Poole of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Ellerin, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.


The verdict convicting defendant of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). Under the evidence adduced at trial, and under the law as charged by the court ( see People v. Noble, 86 NY2d 814), the jury properly concluded that the value of the stolen casino chips was more than $50,000.

The court properly denied defendant's motion to sever the promoting prostitution and possession of stolen property counts, since these counts were properly joined under CPL 200.20 (2) (b). The record clearly establishes that these offenses were inextricably interwoven ( see e.g. People v. Steinberg, 170 AD2d 50, 72-74, affd 79 NY2d 673).

We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments.


Summaries of

People v. Vick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 30, 2005
19 A.D.3d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Vick

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BRADLEY VICK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 30, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
798 N.Y.S.2d 411

Citing Cases

State v. Kairis

We decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of…

People v. Murphy

In any event, we conclude that any error in the admission of that testimony is harmless ( see People v.…