From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Velez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 2003
301 A.D.2d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-09074

Submitted December 3, 2002.

January 21, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Leavitt, J.), rendered September 26, 2001, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Richard S. Birnbaum, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

Jeanine Pirro, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (John C. Thomas and Valerie A. Livingston of counsel), for respondent.

Before: NANCY E. SMITH, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his plea of guilty should be vacated because the County Court did not advise him at the time of his plea that he would be subject to a period of post-release supervision pursuant to Penal Law § 70.45(2). However, since the defendant neither moved to withdraw his plea before sentencing or to vacate his judgment of conviction, his claim is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v. Wilson, 296 A.D.2d 430; see also People v. Kazmirski, 299 A.D.2d 826 [4th Dept, Nov. 15, 2002]), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

SMITH, J.P., O'BRIEN, KRAUSMAN and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Velez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 2003
301 A.D.2d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Velez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. DANIEL VELEZ, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 21, 2003

Citations

301 A.D.2d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 856

Citing Cases

People v. Russell

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made…

People v. Mapp

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. Since the defendant neither moved to withdraw his plea of guilty nor…