From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vailes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1989
150 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

May 1, 1989

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (O'Shaughnessy, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the People failed to prove his intent to sell the cocaine found in his possession, which is an element of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. Contrary to his contention, however, legally sufficient evidence of his intent to sell could be inferred from the evidence adduced at trial that he was in possession of 48 bags of marihuana and 21 packets of cocaine (see, People v Hernandez, 71 N.Y.2d 233, 245).

Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review. Bracken, J.P., Kooper, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Vailes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1989
150 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Vailes

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES D. VAILES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1989

Citations

150 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

People v. Way

On a Saturday night at 7:00 P.M. in a location known for drug traffic, the large number of vials strongly…

People v. Rodriguez

In People v Hernandez ( 71 N.Y.2d 233, 245), the Court of Appeals accepted the proposition that the jury…