Opinion
2001-03265
Submitted April 3, 2003.
May 5, 2003.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered April 10, 2001, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (John Gemmill of counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Ruth E. Ross, and Christopher Ronk of counsel), for respondent.
Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., HOWARD MILLER, THOMAS A. ADAMS, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claim that statements made by the prosecutor during summation constituted reversible error is not preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05; People v. Mejias, 296 A.D.2d 583, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 537; People v. Hugennie, 295 A.D.2d 368), and we decline to review the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (People v. Smith, 215 A.D.2d 603).
The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
FLORIO, J.P., H. MILLER, ADAMS and MASTRO, JJ., concur.