From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Urban

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 19, 1961
15 A.D.2d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

December 19, 1961


Judgment of Court of Special Sessions, convicting defendant of violation of section 1141 of the Penal Law, unanimously reversed upon the law and upon the facts, and information dismissed. This conviction by the Court of Special Sessions was rendered prior to the decision of the Court of Appeals in People v. Richmond County News ( 9 N.Y.2d 578) discussing the standards for determining obscenity in violation of the statute. Here, in light of the opinions in said case, the photographs of male nudes set out in the exhibit on which the conviction is based do not violate the statute so as to establish the appellant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, the record does not support a conviction. ( People v. Richmond County News, supra; People v. Rotto, 13 A.D.2d 634.)

Concur — Botein, P.J., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Urban

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 19, 1961
15 A.D.2d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

People v. Urban

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALBERT URBAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 19, 1961

Citations

15 A.D.2d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Citing Cases

United States v. Darnell

On the other hand, the New York courts have reversed convictions because of reasonable doubt where untouched…

People v. Williams

The test of obscenity under the statute is whether, taken as a whole, the dominant theme of the material…