From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tunstall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 21, 1995
218 A.D.2d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

August 21, 1995

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Mackston, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the sentences imposed upon the convictions for obstructing governmental administration in the second degree (two counts) and leaving the scene of an incident without reporting, are vacated, those counts of the indictment are dismissed, and a new trial is ordered on that count of the indictment charging the defendant with failure to report an accident.

The People conceded at oral argument that the two counts of obstructing governmental administration must be dismissed. The count charging the defendant with leaving the scene of an incident without reporting must also be dismissed (see, People v Mullady, 178 A.D.2d 614).

The trial court improperly precluded defense counsel from questioning defense witnesses as to the defendant's reputation for honesty. Under the circumstances of this case, we cannot conclude that such error was harmless and, accordingly, we order a new trial with respect to the failure to report an accident count. Rosenblatt, J.P., Copertino, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tunstall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 21, 1995
218 A.D.2d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Tunstall

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS TUNSTALL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 21, 1995

Citations

218 A.D.2d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
630 N.Y.S.2d 790