From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tucker

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 15, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1146 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-15

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Marc TUCKER, appellant.

Marc Tucker, Ossining, N.Y., appellant pro se. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Gretchen Robinson of counsel), for respondent.


Marc Tucker, Ossining, N.Y., appellant pro se. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Gretchen Robinson of counsel), for respondent.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Winston McIntosh of counsel), former appellate counsel.

*898 Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated September 30, 2008 ( People v. Tucker, 54 A.D.3d 1065, 866 N.Y.S.2d 209), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered April 2, 2004.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883).

MASTRO, A.P.J., RIVERA, DILLON and BELEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tucker

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 15, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1146 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Marc TUCKER, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 15, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 1146 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3864
943 N.Y.S.2d 897

Citing Cases

Tucker v. Heath

The Appellate Division summarily denied the writ on May 15, 2012, finding that Tucker "has failed to…

Tucker v. Heath

On May 15, 2012, stating that "appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance…