Opinion
May 25, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Cohen, J., at plea; Rosalyn Richter, J., at plea withdrawal motion and sentence).
After conducting a thorough hearing, the sentencing court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The record supports the court's rejection, as unreliable, of the purportedly exculpatory evidence presented by defendant in support of his assertion of innocence. Moreover, even if defendant acquired original possession of the vehicle in question lawfully, he ultimately converted the vehicle to his own use ( see, Penal Law § 155.05; § 155.00 [3], [4]; People v. Kirnon, 39 A.D.2d 666, 667, affd 31 N.Y.2d 877).
Defendant's claim that his factual allocution was rendered insufficient by the plea court's use of a compound question was not specifically raised before the sentencing court nor was it specifically ruled upon by that court. Accordingly, this claim is unpreserved ( see, People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would conclude that defendant's admission of all the elements of the crime may be reasonably inferred from his factual recitations ( see, People v. McGowen, 42 N.Y.2d 905), and that nothing in the allocution casts doubt on his guilt. We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims.
Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Wallach, Lerner, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.