From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Toal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1999
260 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 12, 1999

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed.

CPL 440.30 (4) (d) states that a court may deny a defendant's motion to vacate a judgment without a hearing if "[a]n allegation of fact essential to support the motion (i) is contradicted by a court record or other official document, or is made solely by the defendant and is unsupported by any other affidavit or evidence, and (ii) under these and all the other circumstances attending the case, there is no reasonable possibility that such allegation is true". The court may also summarily deny such a motion if "the moving papers do not contain sworn allegations substantiating or tending to substantiate all the essential facts" (CPL 440.30 [b]).

Here, the defendant's contention that a plea offer which he speculates was made to his counsel in chambers was never communicated to him is not substantiated by any evidence, sworn or otherwise. Indeed, the defendant's conjecture is contradicted by counsel's repeated emphatic assertions during sentencing that the defendant had never been offered a plea bargain, an assertion which was not contradicted by the trial court, and which was corroborated by an Assistant District Attorney, who declared during sentencing that while there had been "some discussion" in chambers it had apparently never matured into a plea offer. In this case which involved an extremely brutal and senseless murder the People had overwhelming evidence to present at trial against both the defendant and his codefendant. Accordingly, there is no reasonable possibility that the Suffolk County District Attorney's Office would have offered a plea bargain to this defendant ( see, e.g., People v. Brown, 56 N.Y.2d 242; People v. Pachay, 185 A.D.2d 287).

Santucci, J. P., Sullivan, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Toal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1999
260 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Toal

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL TOAL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 12, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
686 N.Y.S.2d 726

Citing Cases

People v. Wong

oof submitted in support of defendant's motion was his own affidavit, and it contained only conclusory…

People v. Vasquez

Counsel would also invariably advise his clients concerning the possible maximum sentence that could be…