From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tillotson

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Oct 15, 1937
23 Cal.App.2d 172 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)

Opinion

Docket No. 427.

October 15, 1937.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. Lloyd E. Griffin, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Edgar G. Langford for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Bayard Rhone, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


The clerk's and the reporter's transcripts herein were filed in this court on September 8, 1937. The appellant has made no appearance and no brief has been filed in his behalf. No extension of time for filing a brief for appellant has been requested or granted. The cause was regularly calendared for October 14, 1937, at which time the attorney-general moved the court to affirm the judgment in accordance with the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code. [1] Since the time within which appellant's opening brief should have been filed has expired and no appearance has been made in his behalf the motion is proper and must be granted.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Barnard, P.J., and Marks, J., concurred.


Summaries of

People v. Tillotson

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Oct 15, 1937
23 Cal.App.2d 172 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)
Case details for

People v. Tillotson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. CLYDE EMERY TILLOTSON, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 15, 1937

Citations

23 Cal.App.2d 172 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)
72 P.2d 558

Citing Cases

People ex rel. Garamendi v. American Autoplan, Inc.

Appellate review of the issue may be sought by petition for writ of prohibition. ( Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.…