From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thweatt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 2002
300 A.D.2d 1100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

KA 01-02208

December 30, 2002.

Appeal from a judgment of Genesee County Court (Noonan, J.), entered September 7, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree.

MARY ANN BLIZNIK, CLARENCE, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (DAVID E. GANN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., PINE, HURLBUTT, BURNS, AND GORSKI, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Contrary to defendant's contention, County Court was not required to specify a period of postrelease supervision at the time of the plea or at sentencing and thus resentencing is not required ( see People v. Bloom, 269 A.D.2d 838, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 945). Where, as here, the court fails to specify a shorter period, the period of postrelease supervision for the determinate sentence imposed upon defendant's conviction of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 110.00, 140.25), a class D violent felony offense (§ 70.02 [1] [c]), is three years ( see § 70.45 [2]; People v. Skye, 298 A.D.2d 889 [Oct. 1, 2002]; see also People v. White, 296 A.D.2d 867).


Summaries of

People v. Thweatt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 2002
300 A.D.2d 1100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Thweatt

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STEPHEN W…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 1100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 892

Citing Cases

Quinones v. State of New York Department of Correctional Services

"There was no need for the court to specify a period of post-release supervision. Under Penal Law § 70.45…

Vincent v. Yelich

To the contrary, in the seven years that had passed since Penal Law § 70.45's enactment, New York appellate…