From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thornton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 13, 1907
122 App. Div. 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)

Opinion

November 13, 1907.

Buchanan, Lawyer Whalen [ Robert E. Whalen of counsel], for the appellant.

W.S. Jackson, Attorney-General [ Charles P. Williams, Deputy Attorney-General, of counsel], for the respondent.


The appellant was a lessee of a part of the premises condemned and his unexpired term of two years was valued by the commissioners at $120. He was an owner within section 3358 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which defines an owner as including "all persons having any estate, interest or easement in the property to be taken or any lien, charge or incumbrance thereon."

If the owner is a resident, and not under legal disability to convey title to real property, and an offer to purchase is not served upon him, then he is entitled to costs under section 3372 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This does not limit the meaning of the word "owner," as used in that section, to the owner of the fee. Section 3358 recognizes that one party may own the fee, another an easement, another a leasehold, another may have a charge or incumbrance upon the same parcel of land, but it recognizes each as an owner. An offer must be made to any party whose interest is sought to be condemned, if the person is a resident of the State and is capable of conveying that interest. Where there is an outstanding lease, the owner of the fee cannot convey the entire estate, but he can convey the interest he has. The same is true of the tenant. One is entitled to the notice as much as the other. Each owner is entitled to the offer to purchase, and in the absence of it to costs, if he is a resident of the State and is capable of conveying the interest in the real estate which he has. The public is taking away from the unwilling owner his property, and if it does not offer to each person interested in it the fair value of his interest, there is no reason why it should not pay to him the costs which have been caused by its neglect to make the offer.

The order, so far as it denies costs to the appellant, should be reversed, with ten dollars costs, and his application for costs should be granted.

All concurred.

Order, so far as it denies costs to appellant, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and his application for costs granted


Summaries of

People v. Thornton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 13, 1907
122 App. Div. 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Case details for

People v. Thornton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . WILLIAM THORNTON and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1907

Citations

122 App. Div. 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
106 N.Y.S. 704

Citing Cases

Agana Beach Condo. Homeowners' Ass'n v. Untalan

Id. at 7 (citing Parker v. Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co., 79 Minn. 372, 82 N.W. 673, 673 (Minn. 1900); People…

Champlain Sanford Railroad Co. v. Ostrander

Section 3358 of the Code defines the terms used in the Condemnation Law and "real property" is said to be…