From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thompson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 18, 2015
125 A.D.3d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

02-18-2015

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Clifford THOMPSON, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (De Nice Powell of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Thomas M. Ross of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (De Nice Powell of counsel), for appellant.

Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Thomas M. Ross of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Joel Goldberg, J.), rendered June 16, 2011, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant's contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by the admission of testimony regarding his participation in a prior robbery. During defense counsel's cross-examination of a cooperating witness, he opened the door to a question about the defendant's involvement with that witness in that prior, otherwise unrelated, robbery (see People v. Wisdom, 120 A.D.3d 724, 726, 991 N.Y.S.2d 141 ; People v. Barcero, 116 A.D.3d 1060, 1061, 984 N.Y.S.2d 419 ). Moreover, upon admitting the evidence, the trial court issued an appropriate instruction that limited the potential for undue prejudice (see People v. Sheehan, 105 A.D.3d 873, 875, 963 N.Y.S.2d 309 ).

Next, the defendant contends that the prosecutor improperly introduced evidence that he invoked his right to remain silent. The defendant's contention is not preserved for appellate review and is, in any event, without merit. Contrary to the defendant's contention, he did not invoke his right to remain silent, and the prosecutor did not allege that he had (see People v. Beecham, 74 A.D.3d 1216, 1217, 904 N.Y.S.2d 727 ; People v. Sprague, 267 A.D.2d 875, 879, 702 N.Y.S.2d 132 ; cf. People v. Santiago, 118 A.D.3d 1163, 1166, 987 N.Y.S.2d 692 ). The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, DUFFY and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Thompson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 18, 2015
125 A.D.3d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Clifford THOMPSON, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 18, 2015

Citations

125 A.D.3d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
125 A.D.3d 899