From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Taufman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 31, 2005
14 A.D.3d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2003-11041

January 31, 2005.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mackenzie, J.), rendered October 15, 2003, convicting him of driving while ability impaired by the use of drugs, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Before: Cozier, J.P., S. Miller, Santucci and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution was preserved by his motion to vacate the judgment of conviction under CPL 440.10 ( cf. People v. Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665; People v. Deyes, 3 AD3d 575). However, the challenge is without merit because the plea allocution was sufficient to establish that the defendant operated a motor vehicle while his ability to do so was impaired by the use of drugs ( see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review ( see People v. Lopez, supra at 666; People v. Martin, 7 AD3d 640, 641, lv denied 3 NY3d 677; People v. Deyes, supra at 576), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Taufman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 31, 2005
14 A.D.3d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Taufman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RALPH S. TAUFMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 31, 2005

Citations

14 A.D.3d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
789 N.Y.S.2d 239

Citing Cases

People v. Rivera

Defendant's conviction must be reversed, as the City Court accepted his plea without any allocution.…

People v. Jones

rily, and intelligently entered is unpreserved for appellate review because the defendant never moved to…