From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tatum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 15, 1976
54 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

November 15, 1976


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered February 27, 1976, convicting him of attempted rape in the first degree and assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and new trial ordered. The prosecutor, in his summation, stated that the attorneys for the defendants in this case (appellant was tried with two codefendants) didn't believe the defendants' story, and yet expected the jury to believe it. That was improper (see People v Coles, 47 A.D.2d 905; People v Fluker, 51 A.D.2d 1045) and was reversible error, even in the absence of an objection by defense counsel at the trial (see People v Coles, supra). We have examined appellant's other contentions and find them to be without merit. Martuscello, Acting P.J., Latham, Cohalan, Damiani and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tatum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 15, 1976
54 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

People v. Tatum

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRIS TATUM, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

State v. Stephens

rived of fair trial by errors that included prosecutor's argument to jury suggesting that defense counsel…

People v. Tyler

Defendant seems to be relying on the rule that the prosecutor may not argue that defense counsel does not…