Opinion
October 18, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Rose Rubin, J.).
The Rosario material in question herein, while not timely disclosed, was merely duplicative of information already provided to the defense at a time when it was fully available for cross-examination of the witness. Consequently, reversal of defendant's conviction and remand for a new trial are not warranted under the circumstances applicable herein.
Concur — Ross, J.P., Milonas, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.