From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Suttles

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Apr 29, 2020
941 N.W.2d 645 (Mich. 2020)

Opinion

SC: 160499 COA: 348912

04-29-2020

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcus DeAngelo SUTTLES, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 10, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the October 8, 2018 order of the Eaton Circuit Court denying the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment, and we REMAND this case to the trial court for reconsideration of the defendant’s motion. The trial court’s stated bases for denying the motion were that the motion was "untimely," and "defendant has been released from prison and/or parole has been terminated, therefore this matter is moot." MCR 6.502 does not contain a deadline by which motions for relief from judgment must be filed. Further, the prosecuting attorney concedes there is not a basis for finding that the defendant’s motion is moot.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Suttles

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Apr 29, 2020
941 N.W.2d 645 (Mich. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Suttles

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARCUS DEANGELO…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Apr 29, 2020

Citations

941 N.W.2d 645 (Mich. 2020)

Citing Cases

Crutcher v. Colombo

(ECF No. 1, PageID.21-22.) However, there is no deadline for filing a motion for relief from judgment in…