Summary
In People v. Surace, 295 Ill. 604, we held that counsel for both the State and for the defendant must be allowed all proper latitude in their arguments, and no matter how much the court or opposing counsel may differ with the arguing attorney in his conclusions on the evidence, as long as he is arguing the evidence and drawing conclusions therefrom the court cannot legally interfere.
Summary of this case from The People v. ShackOpinion
July 26, 1982
Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), imposed July 14, 1981. Resentence affirmed.
No opinion. This case is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Mollen, P.J., Lazer, Thompson and Niehoff, JJ., concur.