From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stokes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 22, 2004
5 A.D.3d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-00115.

Decided March 22, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chambers, J.), dated November 29, 2001, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Laura R. Johnson, New York, N.Y. (Jojo Annobil and Lawrence T. Hausman of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Anthea H. Bruffee of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court's determination designating him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and therefore, should be not disturbed ( see Correction Law § 168-n; People v. Cureton, 299 A.D.2d 532; People v. Bottisti, 285 A.D.2d 841).

SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, KRAUSMAN and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Stokes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 22, 2004
5 A.D.3d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Stokes

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, respondent, v. TYRONE STOKES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 22, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
774 N.Y.S.2d 732

Citing Cases

People v. Morris

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Supreme Court's determination…